🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.